Increase your survival and have an abundance!

CoSoCO wrote:

fixed

ChefXenu wrote:

CoSoCO wrote:

fixed

way to insult socialism. o.O

TheAutonomist wrote:

ChefXenu wrote:

CoSoCO wrote:

fixed

way to insult socialism. o.O

But socialism is already an insult! \o/

it is an insult because everyone associates it with authoritarian regimes that were in fact, not socialism

TheAutonomist wrote:it is an insult because everyone associates it with authoritarian regimes that were in fact, not socialism

Bah- it is an insult to me and to Humanity in general. I have the right to keep what I earn through my labor and give voluntarily of my money and time to help others *if* I so choose. The government forcing me to give up what I have earned so others can just skate by? FUCK THAT NOISE.

That is why it has to be authoritarian- otherwise the rest of us would rise up and say FUCK YOU! \o/ to be honest, I find socialism to be by its nature oppressive towards the capable and talented and antiHuman in its principles.

Socialism is failure as an economic system. Centralized systems just beg for toppling.

CoSoCO wrote:

fix'd

TheAutonomist wrote:

CoSoCO wrote:

fix'd

To National Socialism! Delicious irony is delicious!

Whanonstler wrote:

TheAutonomist wrote:it is an insult because everyone associates it with authoritarian regimes that were in fact, not socialism

Bah- it is an insult to me and to Humanity in general. I have the right to keep what I earn through my labor and give voluntarily of my money and time to help others *if* I so choose. The government forcing me to give up what I have earned so others can just skate by? FUCK THAT NOISE.

That is why it has to be authoritarian- otherwise the rest of us would rise up and say FUCK YOU! \o/ to be honest, I find socialism to be by its nature oppressive towards the capable and talented and antiHuman in its principles.

Socialism is failure as an economic system. Centralized systems just beg for toppling.

i take i you have never read Kropotkin, or Bakunin, or any other anarcho-communist for that matter. i agree with you on parts of this, you do have the right to keep what you earn through your labor, do u honestly feel as though one hour of your time creating many products or good(this includes non physical things such as entertainment, art, etc.) is justifiable when you cant even afford an averaged priced book with it? the upper class exploits everyone by underpaying them. also socialism is meant to promote equality and peace which is why militant authoritarian regimes cannot possibly be socialism, Noam Chomsky wrote a decent article explaining this - http://www.chomsky.info/articles/1986----.htm

edit: i like you you have not yet resorted to ad hominem attacks people usually turn to.

Whanonstler wrote:

TheAutonomist wrote:

CoSoCO wrote:

fix'd

To National Socialism! Delicious irony is delicious!

national socialism may be socialism by name, but the principles are completely opposite that of socialism

TheAutonomist wrote:

ChefXenu wrote:

CoSoCO wrote:

fixed

way to insult socialism. o.O

Socialism had nothing to do with it, though I enjoyed reading the posts this idea lead to

In scientology Orgs depend on "Stats" (not to be confused with metrics) for their "condition." An Org doing VERY poorly for more than one or two stat periods is in "condition emergency" a "lower condition" which is indicated, visibly, and in a public place by a "BRIGHT RED" (caps in original) flag on the Org chart.

TheAutonomist wrote:

Whanonstler wrote:

TheAutonomist wrote:it is an insult because everyone associates it with authoritarian regimes that were in fact, not socialism

Bah- it is an insult to me and to Humanity in general. I have the right to keep what I earn through my labor and give voluntarily of my money and time to help others *if* I so choose. The government forcing me to give up what I have earned so others can just skate by? FUCK THAT NOISE.

That is why it has to be authoritarian- otherwise the rest of us would rise up and say FUCK YOU! \o/ to be honest, I find socialism to be by its nature oppressive towards the capable and talented and antiHuman in its principles.

Socialism is failure as an economic system. Centralized systems just beg for toppling.

i take i you have never read Kropotkin, or Bakunin, or any other anarcho-communist for that matter. i agree with you on parts of this, you do have the right to keep what you earn through your labor, do u honestly feel as though one hour of your time creating many products or good(this includes non physical things such as entertainment, art, etc.) is justifiable when you cant even afford an averaged priced book with it? the upper class exploits everyone by underpaying them. also socialism is meant to promote equality and peace which is why militant authoritarian regimes cannot possibly be socialism, Noam Chomsky wrote a decent article explaining this - http://www.chomsky.info/articles/1986----.htm

edit: i like you you have not yet resorted to ad hominem attacks people usually turn to.

Actually, I am familiar with those authors. Are you assuming I have not because I don't agree with their theses, as if to say, if I were familiar I would not hold the beliefs I do? Sorry, but socialism claims to be the fount of equality and all that is good, but it is the sewer in which it drowns (paraphrasing H L Menken) and I do refuse to read Chomsky anymore because he has evolved into a complete fucking asshole who is in love with his own cleverness. Sorry if that sounds reactionary, but he has, as Dieter would say, grown tiresome. The idea that socialism cannot be authoritarian to me is as silly as the claim that black people are incapable of being racist.

I mean, Jesus! It would have to be to get me and people like me to participate in its Dance of Pure Failure.

Liberty and Freedom are where it is at to me, and socialism in my mind is a cancer on them. The whole bullshit rhetoric of the upper classes exploiting the lower is, well, bullshit. MONEY IS INFINITE. Socialism seems to think money is a finite resource that must be controlled and distributed. It is not. It is LIMITLESS and anyone- f'ing ANYONE- is capable of creating it in a legal manner and moving to the station they wish to be.

19th century rhetoric about the classes is fucking played out, Holmes.

do u honestly feel as though one hour of your time creating many products or good(this includes non physical things such as entertainment, art, etc.) is justifiable when you cant even afford an averaged priced book with it?

I am not an idiot, and I get the impression you are not one either, but perhaps it is the phrasing as I do not quite get the point of that sentence.

all in all, I think we can all thank Microsoft Paint for that flag ^^

Fireworks actually.
"Damnit Jim I'm a bookworm not a graphic designer!"

But did it take over 9000 hours? That is what makes it art! \o/

I wondered about the shape of the red flag. Is it forked, squared, or does it come to a single point like a triangle?

TheAutonomist wrote:

CoSoCO wrote:

fix'd

Godwin's law. You lose.

who is john galt anyway?